Error loading page.
Try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, there may be a network issue, and you can use our self test page to see what's preventing the page from loading.
Learn more about possible network issues or contact support for more help.

One Person, One Vote

A Surprising History of Gerrymandering in America

ebook
1 of 1 copy available
1 of 1 copy available
A redistricting crisis is now upon us. This surprising, compelling book tells the history of how we got to this moment—from the Founding Fathers to today’s high-tech manipulation of election districts—and shows us as well how to protect our most sacred, hard-fought principle of one person, one vote. Here is THE book on gerrymandering for citizens, politicians, journalists, activists, and voters.
“Seabrook’s lucid account of the origins and evolution of gerrymandering—the deliberate and partisan doctoring of district borders for electoral advantage—makes a potentially dry, wonky subject accessible and engaging for a broad audience.” —The New York Times
Gerrymandering is the manipulation of election districts for partisan and political gain. Instead of voters picking the politicians they want, politicians pick the voters they need to get the election results they’re after. Surprisingly, gerrymandering has been around since before our nation’s founding. And with technology, those drawing the redistricting lines have, now more than ever, been able to microtarget their electoral manipulations with unprecedented levels of precision.
 
Nick Seabrook, an authority on constitutional and election law and an expert on gerrymandering (pronounced with a hard G!), has written an illuminating, urgently needed book on how our elections have been rigged through redistricting, beginning with the Founding Fathers, Abraham Lincoln, the Civil War, and Reconstruction, and extending to the twentieth century’s gerrymandering battles at the Supreme Court and today’s high-tech manipulations of election districts.
 
Seabrook writes of Patrick Henry, who used redistricting to settle an old score with political foe and fellow Founding Father James Madison (almost preventing the Bill of Rights from happening). He writes of Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry, and corrects the mistaken notion of the derivation of the term “gerrymander.” He writes of Abraham Lincoln and how his desire to preserve the Union led him to manipulate the admission of new states in order to maintain his majority in the Senate.
 
And we come to understand the place of the Supreme Court in its fierce battles regarding gerrymandering throughout the twentieth century. First was Felix Frankfurter, who fought for decades to prevent the judiciary from involving itself in disputes concerning the drawing of districts. Then came the Warren Court and its series of civil rights cases culminating in the landmark decision (Reynolds v. Sims), written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, which says that state legislatures, unlike the United States Congress, must have representation in both houses based on districts containing equal populations—with redistricting as needed following each census. The result has been ever-increasing, hard-fought wrangling between the two political parties after each census.
 
Seabrook explores the rise of the most partisan gerrymanders in American history, put into place by the Republican Party after the 2010 census, and how the battle has shifted to the states via REDMAP—the GOP’s successful strategy of the last decade to control state governments and rig the results of state legislative and congressional elections.
  • Creators

  • Publisher

  • Release date

  • Formats

  • Languages

  • Reviews

    • Library Journal

      January 1, 2022

      Following the more academic Drawing the Lines (Cornell Univ., 2017), University of North Florida associate professor Seabrook speaks to a wide audience as he contextualizes gerrymandering. He opens by revealing Revolutionary-era bend-the-vote efforts by Patrick Henry, James Madison, and Elbridge Gerry, the Massachusetts governor who gave the practice its name, then looks at the Supreme Court's challenge to gerrymandering in the 20th-century and the Republicans' current REDMAP efforts to suppress the vote.

      Copyright 2022 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.

    • Publisher's Weekly

      April 4, 2022
      Political scientist Seabrook (Drawing the Lines) delivers a sweeping study of gerrymandering, the process of manipulating the boundaries of political districts to ensure an election’s outcome. Noting that Patrick Henry attempted to prevent his nemesis, James Madison, from serving in the first Congress by influencing the Virginia state assembly’s districting plan, Seabrook shows that the “partisan manipulation” of electoral maps began well before the 1830s, when a salamander-shaped district drawn by Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry’s Democratic-Republican Party was nicknamed the “Gerrymander.” In the first half of the 20th century, the refusal of state officials to redraw district lines in response to demographic shifts—known as the “creeping gerrymander”—sparked public outrage and led to a series of 1960s Supreme Court rulings establishing that citizens are entitled to periodic redistricting to ensure that the power of their vote was not diluted. These rulings—though well-intentioned—created the conditions by which Democrats placed a stranglehold on California politics in the 1980s and Republican operatives consolidated power in North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and other states in the 2010s. As a remedy, Seabrook urges readers to pressure their state legislatures to establish independent commissions and other nonpartisan redistricting procedures. Dense yet entertaining, this comprehensive survey is a worthy introduction to a high-stakes political issue.

    • Kirkus

      April 15, 2022
      A study of the practice of shaping electoral districts to ensure electoral victory. How did Scott Walker, who lost the popular vote for governor of Wisconsin in 2018 by some 30,000 votes, still carry nearly two-thirds of the state's assembly and senate districts? The answer is simple: gerrymandering--and, as political scientist Seabrook observes, "one of the most egregious instances of gerrymandering in American history." He adds that gerrymandering is a fundamentally undemocratic practice that privileges some votes over others, especially the moneyed, well-connected, White, and conservative. Seabrook traces the history of gerrymandering beyond its supposedly American origins to the English tradition of "rotten boroughs," dating to the 13th century, with small numbers of voters attaining electoral power out of proportion to their numbers and members of Parliament propped up by corrupt measures. Things haven't changed much over time. As Seabrook notes, the 19th century was the heyday of gerrymandering as practiced by nearly every party, so that in one Ohio election, as a contemporary observed, if the Whigs won the state by 10,000 votes, they would still earn only seven congressional representatives while their opponents would have twice as many with the same count. Seabrook shows how gerrymandering has been practiced by both major parties in recent years, with procedural road maps now followed by the GOP often laid out by their Democratic predecessors. Led by the GOP, redistricting is ongoing across the country today, largely with an eye to being sure that districts are "safe"--read: rotten--and, through disenfranchisement measures, not susceptible to being turned by unwanted minorities. In a concluding call to action, the author writes: "How much do you really know about redistricting in your state? If the answer is not much, well, that's what the career politicians already huddling behind the scenes with teams of redistricting professionals, attorneys, political scientists, and strategists are hoping for. Democracy dies in darkness." Valuable reading for voting rights advocates.

      COPYRIGHT(2022) Kirkus Reviews, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

    • Booklist

      April 15, 2022
      Seabrook, a professor of political science and public administration at the University of North Florida and an expert on election law, gives readers an illuminating look into the history of gerrymandering. Although the term has varying definitions, it is, broadly speaking, "a concerted effort to make the votes of certain groups of people matter more than the votes of others." Beginning with examples of gerrymandering in the Middle Ages, Seabrook moves quickly to the American colonies, profiling George Burrington, governor of the province of North Carolina. His ostentatious personality and equally brash election meddling is an early example of disturbing practices that continue to this day. Originating from the actions of Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry, the word gerrymandering is now commonly used in conjunction with redistricting litigation, district line redrawing, and continual failures of the court systems to address brazen injustices, including voter disenfranchisement, that are baked into efforts to win at all costs. With elections on the horizon, One Person One Vote is a timely and trustworthy review of legislative manipulations that reinforce entrenched powers that be and further undermine disadvantaged constituencies.

      COPYRIGHT(2022) Booklist, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

    • Library Journal

      Starred review from May 1, 2022

      Seabrook's (Drawing the Lines: Constraints on Gerrymandering in US Politics) excellent and cogent account of election boundary manipulation proves that political power knows few bounds and explains gerrymandering's history and effects and ways to combat it. When Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry wanted to hold onto power in 1812, he created a misshapen senate district whose residents he believed would elect him. The local newspaper, suspecting nefarious intent, published an image of the district as a salamander; the infamous "gerrymander" was born. But Gerry's efforts were not the first of their kind; Seabrook finds similar manipulations in England's rotten boroughs and describes how the Founding Fathers themselves were not averse to some boundary manipulation. Describing various types of gerrymander, including New York's notorious "handshake deal" and Thomas Hofeller's secretive Republican REDMAP plan, Seabrook also discusses the restrained response of the Supreme Court and its ultimate refusal to become involved in the "political thicket." Seabrook concludes that power lies with the people and explains how some states, led by California, are creating independent election district commissions to defeat political machinations. VERDICT A timely and powerful book that should be read by everyone interested in preserving American democracy.--Penelope J.M. Klein

      Copyright 2022 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.

Formats

  • Kindle Book
  • OverDrive Read
  • EPUB ebook

Languages

  • English

Loading